James Comer doesn't want special counsel appointed for Hunter

Jamie Comer didn't mince words in talking about his investigation into the Biden Crime Syndicate. He doesn't want Merrick Garland to appoint a special counsel to investigate Hunter and Joe Biden. Chairman Comer rightly thinks that his House Oversight Committee is doing a great job already.

Additionally, Chairman Comer said "I have no confidence in special counsels. I have no confidence in Merrick Garland to appoint an independent, credible, unbiased special counsel. I think we're making a lot of progress in our investigation. So, we're gonna continue to plow forward."

Thus far, the Biden administration has used the DOJ, FBI, IRS and 2 Biden-appointed U.S. attorneys to thwart this investigation. The minute that a special counsel is appointed is the minute all the witnesses go silent. What's the usefulness in that?

Further, Chairman Comer hopes to have Devon Archer testify in front of the House Oversight Committee later this week:

"We are looking forward very much to hearing from Devon Archer about all the times he has witnessed Joe Biden meeting with Hunter Biden’s overseas business partners when he was vice president, including on speakerphone," said Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), the committee chairman.
The downside to doing it this way is listening to listening to the Democrats' endless noise that Hunter Biden was just a poor, misguided drug addict and that Joe Biden didn't have anything to do with Hunter's sordid deals. Instead, I wish that all testimony and direct went like this:

Democrats got to cross-examine Mssrs. Shapley and Ziegler. The Democrats definitely took shots at these witnesses. What didn't change was Mr. Shapley's and Mr. Ziegler's testimony. If you want to find out the truth, the cross-examination of witnesses is the best tool in finding out the truth. This isn't a friendly lawyer lobbing softball questions at the witness. This is a hostile attorney grilling the witness to within an inch of his/her life. If the witness's testimony doesn't change, that's a major victory for the prosecution.

I wouldn't trust Garland's DOJ to vigorously investigate Hunter Biden any more than I'd trust a speed-eating champion at an all-you-can-eat meal. Trusting Garland is foolish. Chairman Comer is right in keeping the investigation in-house.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue...
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp...
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio...
Read more