Donald Trump, international softie

Whatever you think of Donald Trump's foreign policy accomplishments, they don't tell the entire story of his foreign policy/national security portfolio. When it comes to war, Donald Trump is pretty wimpy. Joe Rogan praised Trump after Trump's CNN Town Hall for his answer on the Russia-Ukraine War. During that townhall, Trump boldly said "If I'm president, I will have that war settled in one day, 24 hours" before saying that he'd meet with both presidents.

When asked who he wants to win, Trump said "I want everybody to stop dying. They're dying. Russians and Ukrainians. I want them to stop dying. And I'll have that done. I'll have that done in 24 hours. I'll have it done. You need the power of the presidency to do it."

That's the definition of wimpy. When he was president, Ronald Reagan called the Soviet Union the Evil Empire. He was right in giving the Soviets that title because that's who they were. President Reagan also said, when asked what his strategy was with regards to the Soviets, "Simple. We win. They lose." Peaceful co-existence, in President Reagan's opinion, wasn't possible. In contrast, that's the desired outcome in Trump's opinion.

We're standing on the precipice of an historic moment when we can tame Russia for a generation. Trump's goal is to talk peace.

President Reagan told us what he'd do. Whenever the Soviets tried establishing a new beach head, Reagan would establish connections with a rival group, then supply them with arms.The Ukrainians want to defeat Russia. Ukraine's military has manhandled the Russian military when they've had sufficient weaponry. Why won't we let Ukraine win?

Without firing a shot, President Reagan took down the Soviet Union:

Trump frequently brags that he has great relationships with Putin Xi Jinping and Kim Jung Un. The best relationship the U.S. should have with Putin is the one when he's staring up at his tombstone. He wants to resurrect the Soviet Union. Reagan buried that worthless regime 30+ years ago. Let's keep it there where it belongs.

President Reagan, not Trump, is the gold standard for foreign policy and national security. Trump had some worthwhile accomplishments, most prominently the Abraham Accords. President Reagan, though, got rid of the Soviet Union for a generation. As a result, the entire Eastern Bloc went from totalitarian control to liberty in a matter of months. Ukraine, Poland, Romania and other Eastern Bloc nations still stand as a testimony to President Reagan's wisdom. If Ukraine is willing to defeat the Russians, we should give them the weapons to finish the job. Further, those weapons should get there on an expedited basis.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more