Joe Manchin vs. Jim Justice, lopsided race edition

At one point, Jim Justice and Joe Manchin were West Virginia Democrats. Justice succeeded Manchin as governor of West Virginia when Manchin left office to serve in the U.S. Senate. A funny thing happened on the way to Manchin's reelection. He betrayed the people of West Virginia.

Manchin won the special election to replace Robert C. Byrd after Byrd's death. Sen. Manchin's tradition was to act like a moderate West Virginian while in West Virginia. The minute he got to Washington, DC, though, Manchin was 'Mr. Let's-Make-a-Deal', aka 'Mr. Swing Vote.' Principled, he isn't.

This week, a poll came out showing that West Virginians don't appreciate politicians that'll sell them out. The poll showed Gov. Justice with a gaping 22-point lead over the sellout, aka Joe Manchin, saying "West Virginia Gov. Jim Justice (R) is leading incumbent Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) by 22 points in a hypothetical U.S. Senate matchup in 2024, according to a poll released Tuesday." The article continues with this:

Justice leads Manchin 54 percent to 32 percent, with 13 percent of respondents saying they are undecided, according to an East Carolina University Center for Survey Research poll of registered voters in West Virginia.

The same survey found that Justice has a job-approval rating of 57 percent and a 29-percent disapproval rating. Manchin’s job-approval rating sits at 33 percent, with a 59-percent disapproval rating.

Not even the Mountain Valley Pipeline tentative approval appears to be helping Manchin:

It takes a lifetime to build trust. It only takes a moment to destroy that trust. It takes a lifetime to rebuild that trust. Joe Manchin didn't maintain the people's trust. Since he's 75+ years-of-age, he doesn't have enough time to rebuild that trust.

This poll, plus Manchin's betrayal of West Virginia's dominant chief industry, leads me to think that Manchin will either lose badly to Justice or he'll run for president as the No Labels nominee. Either way, Republicans pick up a U.S. Senate seat. Whether Trump can run a terrible enough campaign to still keep the Senate in Sen. Schumer's hands is still debatable.

At this point, both Manchin and Trump have caused lots of their base to think whether voting for them is justified. I'm not buying Jason Chaffetz' statement that Trump's base is rock solid. I agree that there's a portion of Trump's base, which I call 'Always Trumpers', that are immovable. The rest of his voters are still undecided or leaning. The bad news for Sen. Manchin is that his base never was that loyal. That's why he'll lose handily if he runs for reelection.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more