Speed Gibson: North by Northwest – The Agenda

North by Northwest – The Agenda

As I said at the outset, I’m really not here to debate the parental rights issues in play here. Here, I want to talk about the published meeting agenda. I came to hear Agenda Item #4: Public Comments, which followed the Call to Order (#1), Pledge of Allegiance (#2), and District Mission Statement (#3). It was limited to 30 minutes, with individual speakers asked to limit their presentations to 3 minutes. And – to be "civil, courteous, thoughtful, and respectful."

While two speakers went over that 3 minute limit, 11 were heard in about 33 minutes. But with maybe 30 District teachers and staff arriving early, flooding the speaker queue, only supporters of the controversial District policy in question were heard.

This meeting ended about 6:15 PM. Many prior meetings have lasted significantly longer, which makes me wonder why all could not be heard. Were I on the Board, given the short business agenda, I would have made a motion to resume Public Comments after the business items were complete. That would be courteous. That would be respectful.

I would further challenge the Board on even allowing District employees from participating in this forum. They have other, more effective ways to be heard within the organization and their unions, using the proper chains of command. It should make the Board nervous that they could, even unintentionally, present "misinformation" that, even if true, one could infer to be District policy.

Minnesota’s public schools are based on local control, as in Independent School Districts. Yes, there are elections, but current events like COVID and unexpected changes should justify hearing resulting questions and reactions from the parents and taxpayers who wish to be heard. All of them.

Next: The Sound and the Fury

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more