Joe Biden's latest document drama

James Comer, the new chairman of the House Committee on Oversight & Accountability, appeared Monday morning on Fox & Friends First. The topic du jour was Biden classified documents. Chairman Comer said "the investigation into President Biden's alleged mishandling of classified information is of the 'upmost importance' after it was revealed the FBI discovered notebooks in his Delaware home that may contain classified material."

Where doesn't Biden have classified information? Miranda Devine reports that "A Rasmussen poll out Monday, and exclusively revealed here, shows that almost three-quarters of voters (72%) regard the president’s handling of classified records as a scandal. That includes a majority (55%) of Democrats."

This discovery isn't that surprising. Neither is the poll result. Democrats are likely willing to look past Biden's mishandling of these sensitive documents but they've got to know that mishandling top secret documents is wrong. Digging beneath the surface of the Rasmussen Poll doesn't bring a silver lining. Here's another important finding:

But even more damning for the president is that 60% of all voters believe it is likely that information from those classified documents "was used by Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, in his foreign business deals." Fully 44% believe it is "very likely." Among Democrats, 36% believe it is likely that Hunter used his dad’s classified files, with more than one in five saying it is "very likely." Not a good omen for the president’s bid for re-election.
Ted Cruz effectively prosecutes the case against the Biden family in this interview:

Mike Miller is right in speaking out on this. He quoted from Sen. Cruz's 'prosecution' of Hunter:
Hunter Biden didn't write that. Hunter Biden is not an expert on Ukraine. He’s not an expert on Eastern Europe. He’s not an expert on Russia, but that email did help get him on the board of Burisma.

It did help get him paid $83,000 a month because it showed a level of expertise not coming from him, but he was getting it from somewhere. That’s clearly from some sort of briefing. We don’t know whether it was a classified briefing or not, but that is the sort of analysis that is often within a classified briefing.

Here's part of what Hunter allegedly wrote:
Some sort of decentralization will likely occur in the East. If it doesn’t the Russians will continue to escalate there [sic] destabilization campaign, which could lead to a full scale [sic] take over [sic] of the eastern region most critically Donetsk. The strategic value is to create a land bridge for RU to Crimerea.
Hunter might be a smart guy but he isn't a Ukrainian or Russian expert. Besides, what civilian writes RU instead of Russia? This discovery suggests that there's more layers to peel from this onion.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more