Introducing the DFL's Pro-Infanticide Act

The House DFL majority passed the PRO Act on Thursday by a 69-65 margin. This is being called the most extreme abortion bill in the United States. According to the article, "The bill is shorter than a page and doesn’t include any restrictions on when abortions can be performed, leaving those decisions to people and their health care providers. Republicans said the bill had no "guardrails," and that even abortion rights voters do not support abortions in the third trimester."

If enacted, the PRO Act would be as radical as the abortion policies in Communist China and North Korea. The DFL is exceptionally ghoulish. "DFL legislators struck down Republican amendments to regulate abortion facilities, allow local governments to restrict abortion, ban abortions later in pregnancy and protect children who are born after a failed abortion."

The late Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan once said about partial birth abortion "It is as close to infanticide as anything I have come upon in our judiciary." Moynihan was a staunch pro-choice Democrat but he wasn't willing to set aside his common sense or his morality. Apparently, today's Democrats aren't moral creatures.

Like the Inflation Reduction Act, which was dishonestly titled, the PRO Act is dishonestly titled. It should be titled the 'DFL Pro-Infanticide Act.' Abortion without limits means that a woman can abort a fully-formed baby moments before birth. In this report, DFL Rep. Athena Hollins said "I refuse to keep my abortion secret for 30+ years...":

This isn't an heroic act. While I understand that it's sometimes a difficult decision, it's still an immoral act to end a fully-formed baby's life if the mother's life isn't in danger.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue...
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp...
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio...
Read more