Twitter Files Part VII is explosive

The deeper Musk's reporters dig into the Twitter Files, the more sinister this gets. Thanks to Musk reporter Michael Shellenberger's reporting, we now know that the "FBI’s influence campaign may have been helped by the fact that it was paying Twitter millions of dollars for its staff time. 'I am happy to report we have collected $3,415,323 since October 2019!' reports an associate of Jim Baker in early 2021." By that time, Baker had left the FBI.

On Feb. 10, 2021, an email was sent to Twitter's Jim Baker. It talked about a reimbursement program established by the FBI for Twitter. How did Twitter get this intertwined with the FBI? It's one thing for the FBI to contact social media platforms to help shut down drug cartels, child pornography rings, etc. In those instances, the FBI would likely have to present a warrant to obtain this data.

We've also learned that the FBI established a classified briefing for Jim Baker:

The FBI set up a classified briefing for Twitter lawyer James Baker weeks before news reports emerged about incriminating information found on Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop, according to internal Twitter documents. Mr. Baker, a former FBI lawyer chosen for the top-secret briefings, would later push Twitter to block the reports that threatened then-candidate Joseph R. Biden’s presidential run in October 2020.
In fact, it went further than that:
Internal emails, released Monday by independent journalist Michael Shellenberger in the latest installment of Elon Musk’s “Twitter Files,” revealed the depth of ties between federal officials and social media platform. It included the scheme to grant Twitter executives access to classified information as the FBI sought to discredit the laptop computer that had been in the bureau’s possession for 10 months before The New York Post broke the story in October 2020.
Let's remember that the FBI wasn't investigating a crime. They were running interference for the Biden campaign. Let's remember that the FBI is supposed to be politically neutral. In this instance, the FBI didn't just put their thumb on the scales of Lady Justice. The partisan parts of the FBI put their elbow on Lady Justice's scales. It's important to watch Chris Cuomo's interview of Michael Shellenberger:

Let's not forget that the FBI had Hunter Biden's laptop long before Oct. 14,2020. The FBI got the laptop's harddrive in December, 2019. That's more than sufficient time to verify or disqualify the laptop's credibility. Instead, they did this:
Nevertheless, the FBI and Mr. Baker allowed speculation to flourish that Hunter Biden‘s laptop was part of a Russian disinformation operation.
It's time to find out which specific FBI agents and upper-level management helped tip the scales of justice.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more