I disagree with Elon Musk on this

Elon Musk has deleted a tweet in which he criticized Adam Schiff, the notorious liar who currently chairs the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, aka HPSCI, for having too small of a brain. Schiff picked the fight, saying "Elon Musk calls himself a free speech absolutist, to justify turning a blind eye to hatred and bigotry on Twitter. But when journalists report unfavorable news, they are banned without warning. The devotion to free speech is apparently not that absolute. But the hypocrisy is."

Musk finished Schiff off, saying of the Democrat "Thankfully, you lose your chairmanship very soon. Your brain is too small." I disagree with Musk's statement that Schiff's brain is too small. Schiff's problem is that he's the most dishonest man in DC. That's quite a feat, especially considering the fact that Joe Biden and KJP live in DC, too. Let's start by admitting that Musk isn't a free speech absolutist. That doesn't mean he isn't a dramatic improvement over the secretive Jack Dorsey.

Watch Jack Dorsey get accused of dishonesty during his testimony in front of Congress:

Bari Weiss published tweets showing conservative tweets being shadow-banned, conservatives being put on various blacklists and prevented from trending. But I digress.

Adam Schiff is the Democrat who told NBC's Chuck Todd that he'd seen more than circumstantial evidence that Trump had colluded with Russia. When the Mueller Report was published, that evidence didn't exist. This is that clip of Schiff lying to Chuck Todd:

Let me rephrase this. Adam Schiff is a small-brained Democrat. (Aren't they all?) More significantly, Schiff is the most dishonest Democrat in DC.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more