What's at stake in Georgia's runoff

Democracy itself is at stake with the Georgia runoffs. I wouldn't have said this earlier this week. Then again, earlier this week, Joe Biden hadn't said "The idea we still allow semi-automatic weapons to be purchased is sick. Just sick. It has no socially redeeming value. Zero. None. Not a single solitary rationale for it except profit for the gun manufacturers."

That's a breathtakingly arrogant statement of gigantic proportions. According to the article, "Missouri’s 4th congressional district U.S. Representative-elect Mark Alford called Biden’s stance on gun laws 'sheer ignorance,' and cited an article noting that semi-automatic weapons make up 50% of all gun sales in America." I'd characterize his statements as sheer arrogance. He thinks that the Constitution isn't still intact and that the Supreme Court's rulings don't have meaning.

Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie's tweet expresses things perfectly:

That's exactly right. Joe Biden is maligning gun owners, not just gun manufacturers. He isn't just criticizing gun manufacters' profits. He's identifying himself -- again -- as a socialist. Any Democrat that votes for this bill, which Sen. Warnock would do in a heartbeat, would vote against the Second Amendment. A vote against the Second Amendment is a vote against the right to protect one's family.

To Georgians who thought this runoff between Herschel Walker and Democrat gun-grabber Raphel Warnock wasn't a big deal, think again. Democrats want to take half of America's guns away and ban your right to protect your families. Finally, this is as much a minority 'issue' or a women's issue as it is a white male issue. Single moms and minorities are in danger far more often than suburban and rural men. Watch Joe make a Biden out of himself:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more