John Fetterman attempts to lower expectations before debate

It's apparent that Lt. Gov. John Fetterman, (D-PA), is attempting to lower expectations ahead of tonight's debate against Dr. Oz. According to this article, the Fetterman campaign is saying "The memo is hilarious, telling media that they want to 'be clear' that 'Dr. Oz has been a professional TV personality for the last two decades' and 'this isn't John's format.'" Who cares whether this is Fetterman's preferred format or whether he prefers having his wife speak for him? That's a trivial matter comparatively speaking.

The Oz campaign is making it clear that they intend on focusing on what's important with Pennsylvania's voters. This NYPost article highlights Fetterman's inherent weakness, saying "Oz ... has managed to surge in the polls by hammering the twin issues of a slumping economy and rising crime in the state — in addition to raising concern about Fetterman’s health."

This TV segment from the scene of tonight's debate talks about the most important issues listed by people in Pennsylvania:

It doesn't mention Fetterman's auditory difficulties. The only thing left to be determined is whether either (or both) men will execute their strategies. Depite Fetterman's campaign's attempt to lower expectations, this is a make-or-break situation for Fetterman. The momentum is clearly on Dr. Oz's side. He's on the side of the people's most important issues, too, which means he can afford a slip if it isn't a glaring mistake. Because Fetterman isn't on the people's side of the most important issues, Fetterman needs a strong performance in tonight's debate.

Check back her Wednesday for a recap of the debate. This should be must-see TV.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue...
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp...
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio...
Read more