Are Democrats pro-infanticide?

Democrats are playing coy on the issue of abortion. Democrats nationwide have made their campaigns all about abortion all-the-time. When asked if they support any limitations on abortion, Democrats dodge the question.

A spokesperson for John Fetterman replied "John has been clear that he believes that the Supreme Court and Republicans should have left Roe the hell alone, and the whole point is that these decisions should be between a woman, her doctor, and a God if she prays to one — not politicians. Dr. Oz, on the other hand, said he supports banning abortion with no exceptions for rape or incest. These dangerous views are deeply out of step with the people of Pennsylvania."

According to the article, a "spokesperson for Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto referred Fox News Digital to a Reno Gazette Journal article which stated that 'abortion up to the moment of live birth is not a thing, according to obstetricians.'" Then there's this:

Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., Sen. Raphael Warnock, D-Ga., Sen. Maggie Hassan, N.H., Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wa., Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo., D-Nev., Rep. Tim Ryan, D-Ohio., Rep. Val Demings, D-Fla., D-Penn., Lt. Gov., Mandela Barnes, D-Wis., and North Carolina Senate candidate Cheri Beasley, who all expressed their support for the Women's Healthcare Protection Act (WHPA) of 2022, did not respond to Fox News Digital.

The WHPA is the pro-abortion legislation introduced by Democrats that would codify Roe and "permit health care providers to provide abortion services without limitations." Many Republicans have interpreted the legislation as opening the door to late term or even partial birth abortions, since it makes it impossible to place restrictions on abortions in the first two trimesters of a pregnancy, and would make it difficult to restrict abortions after viability.

Abortion services without limitations sounds like it'd include infanticide. That language is exceptionally vague. I suspect it's intentionally vague. This sounds exceptionally evasive:

Democrats say that they want to codify Roe into law. That's an outright lie. Roe prohibited abortion after the first trimester. The WHPA wipes out that provision of Roe. In fact, as I said earlier, the WHPA would permit "abortion services without limitations."

As for Fetterman's reply, he hasn't read the Dobbs decision. That ruling has put the decision back in the hands of the states, not the federal government. Then again, Fetterman doesn't seem too bright. He's avoided debating Dr. Oz, perhaps because he's incapable of debating anyone beyond the age of 16 after his stroke. Does this guy look coherent? I don't think so:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is Joe Biden our Grifter-in-Chief?

Image
Apparently, Joe Biden doesn't care about the law or Supreme Court rulings. When asked about the ruling on his student loan bailout, Biden said that the Supreme Court misinterpreted the Constitution. He knows they didn't. That's just what he said to preserve the opportunity to introduce his next unconstitutional plan that will get rejected by the Supreme Court. This isn't about whether it's constitutional. It's about whether he can con enough young people into voting for him in 2024. Biden must've anticipated this ruling. Within an hour of the ruling, the Administration was out with this detailed fact sheet to replace the plan that he knew would fail. It opens with the same partisan attack as Democrats have mouthed. The fact sheet opens by saying "No President has fought harder for student debt relief than President Biden, and he’s not done yet. President Biden and Vice President Harris will not let Republican elected officials succeed in denying hard
Read more

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

Maria Bartiromo's interrogation of Gov. Ron DeSantis

Image
Yesterday, Maria Bartiromo interrogated Gov. Ron DeSantis on Sunday Morning Futures. The first half of the interview, Bartiromo asked policy questions. Gov. DeSantis showed his understanding of the issues and presented his solutions on everything from China, inflation and growing the economy. The first reply he had was to cut spending. His next reply was to open energy production. Third, he talked about the importance of increasing productivity, which he correctly said is the best way to eliminate inflation. A little over half the way through the interview, though, it turned into an attack. Bartiromo asked "I'm wondering what's going on with your campaign. There was a lot of optimism about you running for president earlier in the year but here's this weekend's headline from the Politico Playbook: Failure to launch. Gov. Ron DeSantis's campaign to topple Donald Trump has stalled. We are way behind says a top DeSantis PAC official. What happened? Despite that bad
Read more