Will Chuck Schumer shaft Joe Manchin with reconciliation bill?

Now that Joe Manchin has signed onto the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, aka the Joe Manchin Walk the Plank Act, will Chuck Schumer return the favor a minute after the Inflation Reduction Act is passed? The other option is to have Nancy Pelosi screw Manchin over. RedState's Nick Arama wrote this article to highlight the pickle Manchin finds himself in.

In the article, Arama notes that "Mr. Manchin said he had won a commitment from his fellow Democrats that they would approve a separate measure to address the process of issuing permits for energy infrastructure, potentially including gas pipelines, in the weeks ahead. The bill would also require new lease sales for oil drilling on federal lands and waters, including in the Gulf of Mexico, which environmental groups oppose."

Then Arama wrote "But as Sen. Marco Rubio observed, this would only happen AFTER he signed on the dotted line for the 'mini Green New Deal.' He thinks that they will ultimately 'screw him over.'"

Sen. Manchin was on all 5 Sunday news shows. The common theme was that the bill a) doesn't raise taxes, b) isn't inflationary and c) will create energy independence. Sen. Manchin said that this was "a red, white and blue" bill that would help everyone. When Bret Baier pressed him on the Penn-Wharton study of the bill, Manchin said that he respected Penn-Wharton but that he just disagreed with them.

When confronted by Baier with a clip of Home Depot co-founder Ken Langone, who also said that the bill was inflationary, Manchin repeated the line that this was just a difference of opinion. Baier also played a clip of Chris Wallace questioning Manchin about the American Rescue Plan about whether it was inflationary. In that interview, Manchin said it wasn't. Check out the Baier interview here:

The total of outright whoppers that Sen. Manchin told in that interview would even make Democrats blush, though I didn't see Manchin blush a single time. I watched a bunch of tap-dancing on the head of a pin from Manchin but I didn't see any blushing.

One of those tap-dancing times came when Baier corrected Sen. Manchin for saying that permitting reform is in this bill. By Senate reconciliation rules, it can't be in this bill. Another whopper came when Manchin said that his bill didn't raise taxes, that it just closes some loopholes. The 15% minimum tax currently doesn't exist. If this bill passes, that tax will be new. That's the definition of raising taxes. That means that Sen. Manchin is the personification of dishonesty, too.

At this point, Sen. Manchin's political career is hanging by a thread. The worst news for Sen. Manchin is that Sen. Schumer, perhaps the most dishonest Democrat in DC, is holding the other end of that thread and he's holding a sharp scissors and he's wearing an impish grin.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more