Democrats are mad with the wrong justices

Democrat activists clearly haven't thought things through the Dobbs Decision. They're upset with the wrong justices. The justices that these Democrat activists should be upset with are the 7 justices that invented the 'right' to abortion in the first place.

Instead, these Democrat hotheads have taken to harassing Supreme Court justices like Brett Kavanaugh when he ventured into a public place. It's unfortunate that these activists can't think straight. These hate-filled activists should be upset with these justices:

  • Harry Andrew Blackmun (Author)
  • Warren Earl Burger
  • William Orville Douglas
  • William Joseph Brennan, Jr.
  • Potter Stewart
  • Thurgood Marshall
  • Lewis Franklin Powell, Jr.
These men invented a constitutional right that doesn't exist.

If I asked a law school student where the right to free speech is, he'd reply 'the First Amendment.' He'd know that because it's clearly written. Similarly, if I asked where the right to keep and bear arms is, he'd reply that it's in the Second Amendment. Again, that right is clearly written. The right to a fair trial is found in the Sixth Amendment. The right to not incriminate yourself is found in the Fifth Amendment. In each of these cases, it's spelled out in unmistakable wording. Why should each of these rights be written so clearly but the 'right' to an abortion was hidden until 1973?

The Tenth Amendment states "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people." Since this wasn't "delegated to" the federal government, SCOTUS didn't have proper jurisdiction to rule on this lawsuit.

Finally, on a slightly different note, it's time for Merrick Garland to start acting like a nonpartisan AG. Check this out:

These whacked-ivists chased a Supreme Court justice and his family out of a DC restaurant. That's what happens when the WH Press Secretary says that it's ok to protest against Supreme Court justices. Check out this reaction to Justice Kavanaugh:
Liberal author Charlotte Clymer tweeted, "I really couldn’t give a sh-- that Brett Kavanaugh’s overpriced steak dinner was made unpleasant by women calling out his sociopathic behavior."

She also wrote, "If you’re appalled that protestors yelled outside a restaurant where Brett Kavanaugh was eating and find that to be uncivil, wait until you hear about the 10 year-old girl who had to travel to Indiana for medical care because Ohio wouldn’t permit her safe access to an abortion."

BTW, the story of the 10-year-old girl who got raped has been checked into and has yet to be confirmed as having actually happened. It might've happened. It just hasn't been confirmed as legitimate. For more on that, check out this article.Ms. Clymer sounds like another hardline progressive who'll repeat anything. Take a long look at the article. It's a portrait of today's Democrat Party. PS- Clay Travis nails it:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue...
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp...
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio...
Read more