Vladimir Putin's fight, WW 3 edition

This past weekend, Daniel Henninger of the WSJ asked a legitimate question. Henninger asked what the difference between WW3 or WW 2.5 was. Later in the weekend, Trey Gowdy asked why it's ok for Russia to bomb baby hospitals in eastern Ukraine or Ukrainian cities 10 miles from Ukraine's border with Poland but it isn't ok to hit Polish people in Poland. I'd love hearing from Joe Biden explain why it's morally defensible to rain holy hell on Russia if they hit Poland but it isn't defensible to rain holy hell on Russia for intentionally bombing a Ukrainian children's hospital.

Let's be clear about this. I don't want U.S. boots on the ground if it can be avoided. Russia attacking a NATO country invokes Rule 5, which says that an attack on one is an attack on all. At that point, war with Russia can't be avoided. Is Rule 5 the only thing that should trigger a NATO response? A strong case can be made that other extenuating circumstances should trigger WW3.

Shouldn't intentionally bombing children's hospitals or civilians living in a nation's capitol also constitute a NATO response? Further, what if NATO's judgment on Russia's military is off badly? I wrote earlier that Russia is a nuclear power put it isn't a superpower. I'm still convinced of that.

Joe Biden is guided (misguided?) by conventional wisdom. When President Reagan called the former USSR an "evil empire", Democrats howled at the top of their lungs. 'You can't do that. You'll start WW3,' they said. President Reagan then put Pershing II missiles into western Europe. Apparently, he didn't worry about escalation.

WW3 didn't happen but the USSR did collapse. Predictably, conventional wisdom was wrong. Anyone that thinks that Putin will leave Ukraine without getting thrown out is foolish. Willfully agreeing to leave Ukraine isn't likely. The odds of Russia capturing and holding Kyiv are higher than Putin leaving Ukraine voluntarily. (Actually, they're about the same.)

I don't want WW3 but I don't fear it, either. It isn't like Russia is a military juggernaut.

It's time world leaders (other than President Zelenskiy) got fitted for new bifocals. The Russians aren't 10 feet tall and their military isn't that tough. I'd say that it's time to cut Putin down to size but he isn't that tall to begin with.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more