Democrats, January 6th and real treachery

Last week, Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris put on a show to tell the American people that our democracy hung by a single, tattered thread on January 6. We were told that we were oh-so-close to losing our beloved democracy. That's a steaming pile of BS.

That isn't to say that what happened on Jan. 6th was one of our nation's finest moments. It wasn't that. It's just that the people entering the Capitol didn't pose a risk to the federal government. If the trespassers had succeeded in occupying the Speaker's office, would Merrick Garland's DOJ have stopped harrassing parents in Loudoun County?

I wrote here about a whistleblower who stepped forward to tell House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jim Jordan that the FBI had sent out an email on Oct. 20. This email allegedly was sent on behalf of "Assistant Director of the Counterterrorism Division and the Assistant Director of the Criminal Division."

This is the so-called Threat Tag email, which was created by the FBI in connection with "investigations and assessments of threats against school board administrators, board members, teachers, and staff."

Check out Gen. Garland's testimony:

Based on the comparison between whistleblower's letter and Mr. Garland's testimony, it isn't difficult to think that the FBI was being used to intimidate parents of students who simply wanted a good education for their children. Let's remember that the initial investigations into "threats against school board administrators, board members, teachers, and staff" would be made by local law enforcement. What proof do we have that local law enforcement had initiated any investigations against parents who had threatened school board members or teachers? Isn't using the FBI's Counterterrorism Division against parents a greater threat against our Republic than a bunch of rowdy but ill-prepared activists?

The FBI put together a system to investigate parents that apparently was run by the Democrats' FBI Counterterrorism Division. If that doesn't sound like intimidation, what does?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more