The Democrats' week from communist/Marxist hell

Mark this week down as the week from hell for Democrats. Joe Manchin saved America by killing the BBB Bill, at least until next year. When that bill died in the Senate, Democrats tried to pivot to passing their voting rights bill, which would've federalized elections. That pivot failed when Arizona Democrat Sen. Kyrsten Sinema refused to eliminate or modify the legislative filibuster.

That's after it was reported that Sen. Richard Blumenthal told "the Connecticut People’s World Committee, a group affiliated with the Communist Party USA (CPUSA)" that he was "really excited and honored to be with you today and share in this remarkable occasion." Guy Benson had the best line of the day yesterday when he said that he'd always hoped that Blumenthal's seat would "one day go red, just not this way":

To highlight how far left Democrats have shifted, check out Elizabeth Warren's op-ed:
This month, a majority of justices on the United States Supreme Court signaled their willingness to gut one of the court’s most important decisions over the past century, threatening to eliminate Roe v. Wade and a person’s right to choose.

This is not the first time this extremist court has threatened, or outright dismantled, fundamental rights in this country. For years, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority, recently supercharged to 6-3, has issued decision after decision that veers away from both basic principles of law and widely held public opinion.

With each move, the court shows why it’s important to restore America’s faith in an independent judiciary committed to the rule of law. To do that, I believe it’s time for Congress to yet again use its constitutional authority to expand the number of justices on the Supreme Court. I don’t come to this conclusion lightly or because I disagree with a particular decision; I come to this conclusion because I believe the current court threatens the democratic foundations of our nation.

That's outright spin. If the Supreme Court strikes down Roe v. Wade, which is still far from a certainty, all that means is that the issue returns to state legislatures and governors, where it should've stayed in the first place. Further, I don't care whether a ruling "veers away from ... widely held public opinion." Public opinion is what politicians often care about. Justices should care about applicable treaties and statutes and the Constitution. Period.

Sen. Warren hasn't had a good week, especially after challenging Elon Musk on Twitter:

That's stunning. Reid and Warren both called Musk a "freeloader." What solar system are they tweeting from? What's frightening for Democrats is that she's a top-tier presidential candidate if Biden doesn't run in 2024. Sen. Warren isn't a person of integrity. She's willing to say anything to anyone win votes. We need a principled president. We don't need a blithering idiot like Joe Biden or someone as dishonest as Sen. Warren.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more