Let's demolish the Omicron faux crisis

It's time to demolish the Biden administration's faux Omicron Variant crisis. In fact, it's time to demolish all future COVID crises before they appear. Tammy Bruce's column highlights the Democrats' next attempt at utilizing the COVID pandemic.

In 2020, Democrats utilized the pandemic to push the 'need' for mail-in ballots. Republicans and independents should immediately reject that in 2022. I'd recommend that Republicans would use Joe Biden's words against him.

During his speech to the nation, Biden said that 2021 was different from 2020. For once, Biden was right. In 2021, we have anti-virals, monoclonal antibodies, 3 vaccines (J&J, Moderna and Pfizer) and a nice variety of therapeutics.

In her column, Bruce wrote:

During the past month, it has become even more clear the Democrats will continue not to let the crisis of the pandemic go to waste. My past experience on the left tells me it will work to extend the COVID-19 emergency as the pretext to again argue for changes making the electoral system less secure but spun as needed in the name of "safety."
I don't doubt that Ms Bruce is right. Democrats are nothing if not predictable, stupid and thoroughly corrupt. What's different this time, though, are the vaccines, monoclonal antibodies, therapeutics and anti-virals. The risk of voting in-person in 2022 will be dramatically different than in 2020. The pandemic is almost behind us. Most of the country has moved beyond Fauci-level paranoia. This propaganda segment will make anyone paranoid:

Omicron spreads quickler than Delta but it isn't as lethal. One report I watched said that cases were up 383%, hospitalizations were up 6% but that there was only 1 death recorded at the time. That says that Omicron is pretty mild. Aside from the propagandists who want us in a permanent state of paranoia, most people have moved on from the pandemic.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more