Elizabeth Warren's excessive whining

It's pretty apparent that it doesn't take much to get under Elizabeth Warren's skin. When Elon Musk was named Time's Man of the Year, Elizabeth Warren jumped into action. Sen. Warren shouldn't have done that. Since then, Musk, the world's richest man and greatest innovator, has gotten the better of her on the battlefield of ideas.

Years ago, G. Gordon Liddy of Watergate fame said that he wouldn't get into a battle of wits with an unarmed man. Elon Musk doesn't share that apprehension with the late Mr. Liddy. Since that opening volley of tweets, Sen. Warren has bought a bunch of Facebook ads criticizing Musk. The common themes of the ads are that a) Musk is a freeloader living off the taxpayer, b) we need a wealth tax so 'the rich' pay their fair share and that c) Musk "whines like a baby."

For instance, one of Sen. Warren's ads says "Thin-skinned freeloader Elon Musk is whining like a baby because I want him to pay his fair share in taxes. Sign up today to make sure that my colleagues in the Senate know that you’re on board to pass a wealth tax and hold billionaires accountable." I don't doubt that there are quite a few people who will sign that petition. The good news is that Musk isn't playing the victim:

"You remind me of when I was a kid and my friend’s angry Mom would just randomly yell at everyone for no reason," Musk added. "Please don’t call the manager on me, Senator Karen 🙏."

"And if you opened your eyes for 2 seconds, you would realize I will pay more taxes than any American in history this year," Musk later added. "Don’t spend it all at once … oh wait you did already."

This should shut Sen. Warren's lying piehole:

This is what Musk's message looks like on Twitter: It's pretty apparent that Sen. Warren a) isn't interested in the truth or b) is a sloppy researcher. Further, Sen. Warren's constant whining is getting old. When it comes to positive contributions to society, Sen. Warren is worthless.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more