Burying Joe Biden's Build Back Better Bill

Larry Kudlow's opening riff contains some inteesting new information on Joe Biden's Build Back Better Bill. This new information isn't likely to push Joe Manchin into voting for the Bill. Contained in Kudlow's riff is a quote from Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen.

First, let's look at the opening paragraph of Kudlow's riff. He opens with his old reliable of "Save America. Kill the Bill. That prospect is looking better and better. You recall Friday two game-changing numbers that may well have dealt the Biden plan for big government socialism a one, two death punch."

Then he transitions into saying "First, the 6.9% consumer price index showed inflation is not 'transitory' and we sure don't need any more government spending. Second, the CBO gave a realistic scoring of the Biden monstrosity by making new entitlement permanent over 10 years or more, rather than the phony gimmick of 'sunsetting' after one year to hide the humongous cost."

Next, Kudlow reminds his audience of a foundational truth:

Actually, the CBO is correctly capturing Biden's policy intent, because he's always talking about his 'transformational' plan. Transformation doesn't mean one year and out. It means permanent. And that's what CBO's new score captures. So transformational permanent translates to $5 trillion in more spending and $3 trillion in a larger deficit.
Finally, Kudlow quotes Ms. Yellen:
"And, there are policies that the president proposed as permanent and that, to achieve consensus, are now temporary in the legislation." Let me repeat. She said, "the president proposed permanent, now temporary."

Ms. Yellen has quite the tightrope to navigate. According to this article, she said "In her letter, Yellen wrote that because Biden has promised to pay for any prospective extension of programs under the current version of the BBB bill, 'it is inappropriate to judge this legislation based on an assumption that future acts of Congress won't be paid for.'" Then she added this:

"Tomorrow, the Congressional Budget Office is expected to release its analysis," Yellen wrote. "To be clear, this should not be confused with a score of the Build Back Better Act, which was already released. Instead, this analysis is of a bill that the House did not pass, the Senate is not considering, and the President, who has committed to paying for permanent investment, would not sign."
QUESTIONS FOR MS. YELLEN:
  • How can legislation be transformational if most of its new programs expire after 3 years?
  • Isn't it true that Biden simply wants to get these 17 programs started, then never get rid of them?
  • Since this bill was mostly written by Bernie Sanders and Sanders has said that $3,500,000,000,000 was already a compromise, why shouldn't we think that $1,750,000,000,000 is a gimmick-filled bill to entice Joe Manchin to vote for Biden's Build Back Better Bill?
This video highlights the Democrats' dilemma:

Rational people perplex Democrats. Up until now, Sen. Manchin has been rational.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more