School choice, Milton Friedman edition

Time for History to Repeat Itself—for Good
By Ramblin’ Rose

Writer and philosopher George Santayana stated in 1905: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” When we consider education, that quote might be positive instead of negative. After the American Revolution, parents, not government, determined the how, what, and where of their children’s education. If only that were the state of affairs today. (That is conjecture—contrary to fact—a wish statement.)

In the 1850’s, Massachusetts was the first state to advocate for government-funded and state-controlled public education. A century later, Milton Friedman wrote The Role of Government in Education. He confirmed the role of government in subsidizing the costs of education but not in controlling it. The control meant a loss of parental influence in the system. Of course, the ones who could afford had the choice of private schools for their children. But sadly, the majority had to send their children to government-supported and controlled schools.

Friedman proposed the use of vouchers to encourage competition among schools to encourage innovative and effective instructional strategies that he found lacking in the majority of public schools. He believed that it was critical to separate funding and delivery in education. This reflected the free market principles of consumer choice and competition to achieve the most effective outcomes.

Wisconsin was the first state to approve a state-wide voucher program for parents to “vote with their feet” for the best educational options for their children. Since then, the majority of states have developed programs of vouchers, tax-credit scholarships, and individual tax credits and deductions. Recently, advocates of educational choice suggest Educational Savings Accounts (ESA) that would allow tax dollars to follow the child in a variety of educational options instead of subsidizing only government-fund schools.

In Friedman’s words: "Government, preferably local governmental units, would give each child, through his parents, a specified sum to be used solely in paying for his general education; the parents would be free to spend this sum at a school of their own choice, provided it met certain minimum standards laid down by the appropriate governmental unit. Such schools would be conducted under a variety of auspices: by private enterprises operated for profit, nonprofit institutions established by private endowment, religious bodies, and some even by governmental units."

The majority of parents want the best for their children. Too many schools do not recognize individual differences and/or are unable to provide the means to allow each student to learn in a unique and personal style.

Let us adapt and implement the free market competitive ideals of Friedman for the best of our next generation.

Here's Part I of Friedman's video on school choice:


Part II:
Part III:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is Joe Biden our Grifter-in-Chief?

Image
Apparently, Joe Biden doesn't care about the law or Supreme Court rulings. When asked about the ruling on his student loan bailout, Biden said that the Supreme Court misinterpreted the Constitution. He knows they didn't. That's just what he said to preserve the opportunity to introduce his next unconstitutional plan that will get rejected by the Supreme Court. This isn't about whether it's constitutional. It's about whether he can con enough young people into voting for him in 2024. Biden must've anticipated this ruling. Within an hour of the ruling, the Administration was out with this detailed fact sheet to replace the plan that he knew would fail. It opens with the same partisan attack as Democrats have mouthed. The fact sheet opens by saying "No President has fought harder for student debt relief than President Biden, and he’s not done yet. President Biden and Vice President Harris will not let Republican elected officials succeed in denying hard
Read more

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

Maria Bartiromo's interrogation of Gov. Ron DeSantis

Image
Yesterday, Maria Bartiromo interrogated Gov. Ron DeSantis on Sunday Morning Futures. The first half of the interview, Bartiromo asked policy questions. Gov. DeSantis showed his understanding of the issues and presented his solutions on everything from China, inflation and growing the economy. The first reply he had was to cut spending. His next reply was to open energy production. Third, he talked about the importance of increasing productivity, which he correctly said is the best way to eliminate inflation. A little over half the way through the interview, though, it turned into an attack. Bartiromo asked "I'm wondering what's going on with your campaign. There was a lot of optimism about you running for president earlier in the year but here's this weekend's headline from the Politico Playbook: Failure to launch. Gov. Ron DeSantis's campaign to topple Donald Trump has stalled. We are way behind says a top DeSantis PAC official. What happened? Despite that bad
Read more