Joe Biden's interview from hell

When Joe Biden sat down for his interview with ABC's George Stephanopoulos, Biden thought he'd get softball question after softball question. Instead, he got peppered with legitimate, hard-hitting question. By the time it was done, Biden had made more news.

During the interview, Biden announced that American troops would stay in Afghanistan until every American was brought home. He also said that he didn't know how this chaotic finish could've been avoided. That's a jaw-dropping statement.

All Biden had to do was keep some troops in Afghanistan until the diplomats, foreign nationals and US assets had been removed from Aghanistan. Instead, he got the military out first, then shut down Bagram in the middle of the night without warning.

 

Joe Biden also told Stephanopoulos that " I don’t think it could’ve been handled in a way that. We’re going to go back in hindsight and look but the idea that somehow there was a way to have gotten out without chaos ensuing, I don’t know how that happens." I think that's an honest answer -- for Joe Biden. I think he isn't smart enough to figure out a way of getting our troops and allies out of Afghanistan without this chaos.

Thanks to Big Tech and the MSM, Joe Biden won the election. If the MSM had done its job of reporting, Donald Trump would be serving his second term right now. Instead, we're stuck with the worst president of my lifetime for the next 3+ years.

What's worse than the interview is the Biden administration's national security team's collapse. Austin, Blinken, Milley and Sullivan should all be fired. Thousands of Americans were left behind initially. Then they were told they'd have to pay $2,000 per flight to get out of Afghanistan. Foreign nationals were left behind. Ditto with Afghan translators who helped US troops.

The Biden administration apparently didn't care until this turned into the clusterf**k for the ages. The frightening thought is that Biden was the best that the Democrats had to offer in 2020.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more