Kevin McCarthy's fight with Nancy Pelosi

Wednesday afternoon, House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy took Nancy Pelosi, the Democrat Speaker of the House, to the proverbial woodshed. During his impromptu news conference, McCarthy refered to Pelosi as the "lame duck speaker." Specifically, he said "This has not happened before. House Democrats must answer this question. Why are you allowing a lame duck speaker to destroy this institution? This is the peoples' House, not Pelosi's House."

This happened after Speaker Pelosi announced that she wasn't approving Jim Jordan and Jim Banks to be part of the select committee. Leader McCarthy said that "Speaker Pelosi has taken the unprecedented step of denying the minority party's picks for the select committee on Jan. 6. This represents something that has not happened in the House before for a select committee, by the historian."

Undoubtedly, Jordan and Banks were picked to cause heartburn for Pelosi's Democrats. It's also true, though, that Jordan is a fierce investigator/interrogator capable of being both a partisan irritant and the person who gets to the bottom of things. This wasn't meant to be a serious investigation. That was obvious since the moment Pelosi picked Liz Cheney to be part of the committee. If Pelosi wanted this to be a serious committee, she wouldn't have picked a Trump-hating GOP establishmentarian for the committee.

At this point, Cheney isn't a serious member of the GOP. If she's defeated in the Wyoming Primary, I suspect that most of the people in the House GOP Conference will quietly applaud. She hates the dominant wing of the GOP because she's a tried-and-true denizen of the Swamp. It's time to throw her into that Swamp and move onto someone with integrity.

The strongest part of McCarthy's speech came when he noted that Senate committees had finished 2 bipartisan reports. He also asked a question that the Pelosi-Schiff-Cheney committee won't answer. McCarthy asked "Why was the Capitol so ill-prepared for that day when they knew on Dec. 14 that they had a problem?"

This wasn't a serious attempt to investigate 1/6. The fact that the committee had Adam Schiff and Liz Cheney on it guaranteed that it was mostly a mostly partisan attempt.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more