Kamala Harris visits Texas, then California

The MSM is apparently satisfied that VP Harris visited the US-Mexico border despite never visiting the US-Mexico border. She stopped at the airport, then met with some pro-open borders NGOs. Then she flew to California for the weekend.

It's instructive what VP Harris didn't do in Texas. Let's compare her photo-op with President Trump's typical border visit. When he'd visit, President Trump always held a 2-hr. meeting with border patrol agents, local sheriffs, mayors, ranchers and senators. He'd spend his time listening to what law enforcement needed.

By comparison, VP Harris, Secretary Mayorkas and Rep. Escobar engaged in happy talk about improving conditions at Fort Bliss, how El Paso is the "new Ellis Island" and how this administration inherited a broken immigration system.

Mayorkas didn't explain how it was possible to see "tremendous progress" while HHS people confiscated metal objects and ID badges, then put teenagers were put on suicide watch. That's the definition of happy talk.

Yesterday on The Big Saturday Show, Griff Jenkins reported that he'll be spending the next week in the RGV. He invited VP Harris to join him. He promised to give her a personal tour of the border. Obviously, that won't happen. The last thing Harris wants to do is find out what's happening on the border. Here's another option:

That won't happen, either. If she actually met with front-line workers, she'd find out that they love the wall. She'd also find out that the Biden administration created this crisis. The Biden administration can't let those tidbits of information get out. They'd destroy the Democrats' and the MSM's narrative. If that ever collapsed, they'd have to admit that Trump was right. Democrats would do anything to avoid that.

After her brief stop in Texas, she flew off for a weekend in California. Meanwhile. Secretary Mayorkas and Sen. Durbin flew back to DC.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more