The Trump recovery continues

Yesterday, the March jobs report proved that the Trump Recovery is continuing. The monthly jobs report showed that 916,000 jobs were created in March, easily outdistancing the expected 675,000 jobs that were predicted. This questions whether the $2,000,000,000,000 Biden-Pelosi COVID relief package was needed. HINT: It wasn't. The policies put in place by President Trump ushered in a gusher of new jobs and economic growth. The Trump jobs recovery started in May, 2020, when the economy unexpectedly created 2,500,000 jobs. The June jobs report showed that the economy created 4,800,000 jobs. The July jobs report showed that the economy created 1,800,000 jobs. Job creation slowed after that because Nancy Pelosi slammed the breaks on another relief package until after the election. Job creation picked back up once the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines were approved and the final Trump relief package was passed. The $1.9 trillion Biden-Pelosi 'relief' package was done so Joe Biden will point to that as the turning point for the economy. It wasn't. The jobs reports clearly show the truth. The jobs recovery started 3 months before Joe Biden accepted the Democrats' nomination. What's hilarious is the fact that Joe Biden unwittingly admitted that this is the Trump Recovery at the start of this speech: When he said that the first 2 jobs reports of his administration were the biggest in history, he unwittingly admitted that they were the result of President Trump's policies. Biden can't take credit for the jobs created because this happened before any of his policies were implemented.

Comments

  1. eric zaetschApril 11, 2021 at 6:45 PM

    You call it "Trump Recovery." Not "McConnell Recovery?" Picking sides?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gary GrossOctober 5, 2021 at 11:19 PM

      Trump proposed the policies. McConnell got them passed.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue...
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp...
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio...
Read more