Minneapolis dismantled, Part II

Apparently, the Minneapolis City Council didn't embarrass itself enough when it voted unanimously to dismantle the Minneapolis Police Department. Now, they're back to take another stab at embarrassing themselves with regard to enforcing the law. The Minneapolis City Council voted unanimously "for the development of a new Traffic Safety Division. This was first reported by KMSP-TV, aka Fox9 News. Fox9 reported "the City Council approved for staff to design and develop recommendations for the proposed new division, which would not be a part of the Minneapolis Police Department." This City Council is both stupid and unserious. They've voted unanimously to put these law enforcement officers' lives in danger. To a thug who doesn't care about laws, it's irrelevant whether the person pulling them over is part of the Minneapolis Police Department or whether they're part of the Traffic Safety Division. This was supposedly a routine traffic stop: Disarming police making traffic stops is the law enforcement equivalent of posting 'gun-free zones' on malls. Thugs interpret gun-free zone signs as saying looters' and criminals' paradise. No guns equal no risk for criminals. Councilmember Phillipe Cunningham is setting the wrong priorities for the community:
"We urgently need traffic safety in our community," Cunningham said Friday in a Facebook post announcing the proposal. "We also need for increasing traffic safety to not come at a great cost of harm to our neighbors in the process. This issue is very complex, but it is surmountable."
What's needed is for people to obey the police. What's needed is for people to stop committing crimes, then not showing up for their court appearance. That's what Daunte Wright did. Officer Potter knew that Wright hadn't appeared for his hearing for allegedly assaulting a woman with a gun. QUESTION: Why are so few people ignoring the fact that Wright was accused of committing a gun crime? This won't help Wright's family:
Burnsville police say a carjacking suspect is dead after a shootout with officers Sunday afternoon. It happened at about 3 p.m. on Interstate 35W at County Road 13. Police say the suspect, a white man in his 20s, was being pursued by officers for driving a vehicle with stolen plates. The man crashed that car, then carjacked a woman at gunpoint. The pursuit continued, with police alleging the man fired several shots at officers. He then crashed the second stolen car, and attempted to carjack two other drivers at gunpoint before he was fired upon by several officers. No members of law enforcement were hurt, and there are no reported injuries of motorists who were travelling amidst the gunfire.
The common denominator in Wright's case and this case is that the alleged criminal used a gun and represented a threat. The other common denominator is that lawlessness is tolerated, even overlooked.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more